Summary
- PVDF is rated better with
- Aromatic hydrocarbons (+100 points); Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons (+96 points); Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils (+84 points); Phenols (+64 points); Halogenated hydrocarbons (+49 points); Organic acids (+47 points); Mineral acids (+47 points); Alcohols and glycols (+45 points); Amines and nitrogen compounds (+43 points); Esters and ethers (+39 points); Ketones and aldehydes (+31 points); Oxidising agents and halogens (+22 points)
- EPDM is rated better with
- Alkalis (+36 points)
- Within 10 points of each other
- Salts and salt solutions; Foods and beverages
Points are the difference in the share of rows rated A or B.
The two materials
PVDF
Polyvinylidene fluoride
PVDF resists acids, halogens and hydrocarbons. Strong bases, amines, ketones and esters attack it. Service temperature is up to about 150 °C.
Rated rows: 944. A 73 %, B 15 %, C 10 %, D 2 %
EPDM
Ethylene propylene diene rubber
EPDM resists water, steam, alkalis, ketones and alcohols. Mineral oils, fuels and aromatic solvents swell it severely.
Rated rows: 976. A 44 %, B 9 %, C 20 %, D 28 %
Share of rows rated A or B, by chemical class
How often the two ratings agree
Chemical classes were assigned by this site, not by the source. Mixtures and trade products without a clear class are not counted.
By chemical class
| Chemical class | PVDF: rated A or B | EPDM: rated A or B |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral acids | 87 % (61 rows) | 40 % (63 rows) |
| Organic acids | 94 % (64 rows) | 47 % (64 rows) |
| Alkalis | 64 % (22 rows) | 100 % (22 rows) |
| Salts and salt solutions | 99 % (198 rows) | 98 % (198 rows) |
| Oxidising agents and halogens | 87 % (62 rows) | 65 % (62 rows) |
| Alcohols and glycols | 98 % (58 rows) | 53 % (58 rows) |
| Phenols | 71 % (14 rows) | 7 % (14 rows) |
| Ketones and aldehydes | 62 % (34 rows) | 31 % (35 rows) |
| Esters and ethers | 64 % (66 rows) | 25 % (72 rows) |
| Amines and nitrogen compounds | 76 % (38 rows) | 33 % (39 rows) |
| Aromatic hydrocarbons | 100 % (14 rows) | 0 % (14 rows) |
| Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons | 97 % (72 rows) | 1 % (78 rows) |
| Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils | 88 % (48 rows) | 4 % (48 rows) |
| Halogenated hydrocarbons | 72 % (54 rows) | 23 % (71 rows) |
| Foods and beverages | 98 % (46 rows) | 93 % (46 rows) |
Where the ratings differ most
Rows where the two ratings at 20 °C are at least two grades apart: 344 in total, the first 40 shown.
| Chemical | Concentration | PVDF | EPDM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2-Dibromoethane | A | D | |
| 1,2-Dichlorobenzene | A | D | |
| 1,3-Butadiene | A | D | |
| 1,4-Dichlorobenzene | A | D | |
| 1-Chloronaphthalene | A | D | |
| 1-Heptanol | A | D | |
| Acetic Acid | 100 % | A | D |
| Acetic Acid | 50 % | A | D |
| Acetic Acid | 90 % | A | D |
| Acetyl Chloride | 100 % | A | D |
| Allyl Chloride | 100 % | A | D |
| Almond Oil | A | D | |
| Amyl Chloride | A | D | |
| Aniline | A | D | |
| Beef Tallow | A | D | |
| Beef Tallow Emulsion | sulfuriert | A | D |
| Benzene | A | D | |
| Benzenesulfonic Acid | saturated | A | D |
| Bone Oil | A | D | |
| Bromine | A | D | |
| Bromine Vapors | A | D | |
| Bromine Water | saturated | A | D |
| Bromobenzene | A | D | |
| Bromomethane | technical grade | A | D |
| Butane | technical grade | A | D |
| Butyl Acrylate | 100 % | A | D |
| Butyl Stearate | 100 % | A | D |
| Butylphenol | 100 % | A | D |
| Butyric Acid | A | D | |
| Calcium Bisulfite | saturated | A | D |
| Calcium Bisulfite | aqueous | A | D |
| Carbon Disulfide | A | D | |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | A | D | |
| Chlorine | 97 % | A | D |
| Chlorine Gas | A | D | |
| Chlorobenzene | A | D | |
| Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) | A | D | |
| Chloroform | 100 % | A | D |
| Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) | technical grade | A | D |
| Chlorotoluene | A | D |
Rating scale
- A very good resistance
- B good resistance
- C limited resistance
- D not resistant
- – no data
- K no general statement possible
A rating marked * is an estimate in the source, not a test result. An estimate is given as one value without a temperature.
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PVDF or EPDM more chemical-resistant?
Of 941 chemicals rated for both materials at 20 °C, PVDF and EPDM share the same rating in 430 rows (46 %). PVDF is rated better in 452 rows and EPDM in 59 rows.
How do PVDF and EPDM compare for chemical resistance?
Based on 941 chemicals tested for both: PVDF is rated better with Aromatic hydrocarbons, Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons, Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils, Phenols. EPDM is rated better with Alkalis. They perform similarly with Salts and salt solutions, Foods and beverages.
About this data
The ratings come from the chemical resistance list published by Bürkle GmbH, which compiled them from raw-material manufacturers’ data. They describe laboratory tests on the raw material at 20 °C and 50 °C.
A finished part also sees pressure, mechanical stress, welds and mixtures that a laboratory test does not. Treat the rating as a first filter and test under your own conditions before relying on it.