Summary
- PP is rated better with
- Phenols (+72 points); Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils (+71 points); Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons (+62 points); Organic acids (+50 points); Amines and nitrogen compounds (+46 points); Alcohols and glycols (+40 points); Ketones and aldehydes (+38 points); Esters and ethers (+38 points); Mineral acids (+30 points); Aromatic hydrocarbons (+14 points)
- EPDM is rated better with
- Halogenated hydrocarbons (+19 points)
- Within 10 points of each other
- Alkalis; Salts and salt solutions; Oxidising agents and halogens; Foods and beverages
Points are the difference in the share of rows rated A or B.
The two materials
PP
Polypropylene
Polypropylene resists most acids, alkalis and salt solutions. Concentrated oxidising acids, chlorinated solvents and aromatic hydrocarbons attack it, and it turns brittle below about 0 °C.
Rated rows: 978. A 66 %, B 11 %, C 15 %, D 8 %
EPDM
Ethylene propylene diene rubber
EPDM resists water, steam, alkalis, ketones and alcohols. Mineral oils, fuels and aromatic solvents swell it severely.
Rated rows: 976. A 44 %, B 9 %, C 20 %, D 28 %
Share of rows rated A or B, by chemical class
How often the two ratings agree
Chemical classes were assigned by this site, not by the source. Mixtures and trade products without a clear class are not counted.
By chemical class
| Chemical class | PP: rated A or B | EPDM: rated A or B |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral acids | 70 % (63 rows) | 40 % (63 rows) |
| Organic acids | 97 % (64 rows) | 47 % (64 rows) |
| Alkalis | 100 % (22 rows) | 100 % (22 rows) |
| Salts and salt solutions | 99 % (198 rows) | 98 % (198 rows) |
| Oxidising agents and halogens | 72 % (61 rows) | 65 % (62 rows) |
| Alcohols and glycols | 93 % (59 rows) | 53 % (58 rows) |
| Phenols | 79 % (14 rows) | 7 % (14 rows) |
| Ketones and aldehydes | 69 % (35 rows) | 31 % (35 rows) |
| Esters and ethers | 63 % (71 rows) | 25 % (72 rows) |
| Amines and nitrogen compounds | 79 % (39 rows) | 33 % (39 rows) |
| Aromatic hydrocarbons | 14 % (14 rows) | 0 % (14 rows) |
| Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons | 63 % (78 rows) | 1 % (78 rows) |
| Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils | 75 % (48 rows) | 4 % (48 rows) |
| Halogenated hydrocarbons | 4 % (70 rows) | 23 % (71 rows) |
| Foods and beverages | 100 % (46 rows) | 93 % (46 rows) |
Where the ratings differ most
Rows where the two ratings at 20 °C are at least two grades apart: 265 in total, the first 40 shown.
| Chemical | Concentration | PP | EPDM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic Acid | 100 % | A | D |
| Acetic Acid | 50 % | A | D |
| Acetic Acid | 90 % | A | D |
| Aviation Fuels (JP) | A | D | |
| Beef Tallow | A | D | |
| Beef Tallow Emulsion | sulfuriert | A | D |
| Bitumen | A | D | |
| Bone Oil | A | D | |
| Butane | technical grade | A | D |
| Butylphenol | 100 % | A | D |
| Calcium Bisulfite | saturated | A | D |
| Calcium Bisulfite | aqueous | A | D |
| Camphor | A | D | |
| Chlorodifluoromethane | D | A | |
| Chromic Acid | 10 % | A | D |
| Coal Tar Oil | 100 % | A | D |
| Coconut Oil | technical grade | A | D |
| Corn Germ Oil | technical grade | A | D |
| Crude Oil | A | D | |
| Crude Oil | 100 % | A | D |
| Cyclohexanol | technical grade | A | D |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 50 % | A | D |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | technical grade | A | D |
| Diesel Fuel | A | D | |
| Diesel Fuel | 100 % | A | D |
| Diisobutylene | A | D | |
| Dipropylene Glycol | A | D | |
| Gas Oil | A | D | |
| Grease | A | D | |
| Grease | A | D | |
| Grease | A | D | |
| HD Motor Oil, Aromatic-Free | A | D | |
| Heating Oil | A | D | |
| Hexanol | A | D | |
| Hydraulic Oil | A | D | |
| Hydroquinone | saturated | A | D |
| Isooctane | technical grade | A | D |
| Linseed Oil | technical grade | A | D |
| Machine Oil | 100 % | A | D |
| Maleic Acid | saturated | A | D |
Rating scale
- A very good resistance
- B good resistance
- C limited resistance
- D not resistant
- – no data
- K no general statement possible
A rating marked * is an estimate in the source, not a test result. An estimate is given as one value without a temperature.
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PP or EPDM more chemical-resistant?
Of 970 chemicals rated for both materials at 20 °C, PP and EPDM share the same rating in 476 rows (49 %). PP is rated better in 431 rows and EPDM in 63 rows.
How do PP and EPDM compare for chemical resistance?
Based on 970 chemicals tested for both: PP is rated better with Phenols, Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils, Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons, Organic acids. EPDM is rated better with Halogenated hydrocarbons. They perform similarly with Alkalis, Salts and salt solutions, Oxidising agents and halogens, Foods and beverages.
About this data
The ratings come from the chemical resistance list published by Bürkle GmbH, which compiled them from raw-material manufacturers’ data. They describe laboratory tests on the raw material at 20 °C and 50 °C.
A finished part also sees pressure, mechanical stress, welds and mixtures that a laboratory test does not. Treat the rating as a first filter and test under your own conditions before relying on it.