Summary
- SAN is rated better with
- Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons (+78 points); Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils (+64 points); Organic acids (+32 points); Amines and nitrogen compounds (+23 points); Mineral acids (+21 points); Phenols (+18 points); Alcohols and glycols (+17 points)
- EPDM is rated better with
- Esters and ethers (+25 points); Halogenated hydrocarbons (+18 points); Foods and beverages (+11 points)
- Within 10 points of each other
- Alkalis; Salts and salt solutions; Oxidising agents and halogens; Ketones and aldehydes
Points are the difference in the share of rows rated A or B.
The two materials
SAN
Styrene-acrylonitrile
Styrene-acrylonitrile resists oils and dilute acids better than polystyrene, but ketones, esters and aromatic and chlorinated solvents still attack it.
Rated rows: 364. A 67 %, B 0 %, C 9 %, D 24 %
EPDM
Ethylene propylene diene rubber
EPDM resists water, steam, alkalis, ketones and alcohols. Mineral oils, fuels and aromatic solvents swell it severely.
Rated rows: 976. A 44 %, B 9 %, C 20 %, D 28 %
Share of rows rated A or B, by chemical class
How often the two ratings agree
Chemical classes were assigned by this site, not by the source. Mixtures and trade products without a clear class are not counted.
By chemical class
| Chemical class | SAN: rated A or B | EPDM: rated A or B |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral acids | 61 % (18 rows) | 40 % (63 rows) |
| Organic acids | 79 % (24 rows) | 47 % (64 rows) |
| Alkalis | 100 % (8 rows) | 100 % (22 rows) |
| Salts and salt solutions | 100 % (80 rows) | 98 % (198 rows) |
| Oxidising agents and halogens | 73 % (26 rows) | 65 % (62 rows) |
| Alcohols and glycols | 70 % (33 rows) | 53 % (58 rows) |
| Phenols | 25 % (8 rows) | 7 % (14 rows) |
| Ketones and aldehydes | 21 % (19 rows) | 31 % (35 rows) |
| Esters and ethers | 0 % (19 rows) | 25 % (72 rows) |
| Amines and nitrogen compounds | 56 % (9 rows) | 33 % (39 rows) |
| Aromatic hydrocarbons | – | 0 % (14 rows) |
| Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons | 79 % (24 rows) | 1 % (78 rows) |
| Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils | 68 % (22 rows) | 4 % (48 rows) |
| Halogenated hydrocarbons | 5 % (20 rows) | 23 % (71 rows) |
| Foods and beverages | 82 % (22 rows) | 93 % (46 rows) |
Where the ratings differ most
Rows where the two ratings at 20 °C are at least two grades apart: 90 in total, the first 40 shown.
| Chemical | Concentration | SAN | EPDM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Heptanol | A | D | |
| Acetone | D | A | |
| Allyl Alcohol | 96 % | D | A |
| Almond Oil | A | D | |
| Beef Tallow Emulsion | sulfuriert | A | D |
| Bone Oil | A | D | |
| Brake Fluid | D | A | |
| Butane | technical grade | A | D |
| Camphor | A | D | |
| Cinnamaldehyde | D | A | |
| Coconut Fat | A | D | |
| Corn Germ Oil | technical grade | A | D |
| Cyclohexane | A | D | |
| Cyclohexanol | technical grade | A | D |
| Diacetone Alcohol | D | A | |
| Diesel Fuel | 100 % | A | D |
| Heating Oil | A | D | |
| Hexachlorobenzene | A | D | |
| Hexanol | A | D | |
| Hydroquinone | saturated | A | D |
| Isooctane | technical grade | A | D |
| Lanolin | technical grade | A | D |
| Ligroin | A | D | |
| Linseed Oil | technical grade | A | D |
| Margarine | A | D | |
| Methylcyclohexane | A | D | |
| n-Heptane | A | D | |
| n-Hexane | A | D | |
| Naphthalene | 100 % | A | D |
| n-Octane | A | D | |
| Oleic Acid | technical grade | A | D |
| Olive Oil | A | D | |
| Palm Oil | A | D | |
| Palmitic Acid | technical grade | A | D |
| Peanut Oil | A | D | |
| Pentane | A | D | |
| Petroleum Oil | A | D | |
| Propane | liquid | A | D |
| Stauffer Grease | A | D | |
| Transformer Oil | A | D |
Rating scale
- A very good resistance
- B good resistance
- C limited resistance
- D not resistant
- – no data
- K no general statement possible
A rating marked * is an estimate in the source, not a test result. An estimate is given as one value without a temperature.
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SAN or EPDM more chemical-resistant?
Of 363 chemicals rated for both materials at 20 °C, SAN and EPDM share the same rating in 194 rows (53 %). SAN is rated better in 119 rows and EPDM in 50 rows.
How do SAN and EPDM compare for chemical resistance?
Based on 363 chemicals tested for both: SAN is rated better with Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons, Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils, Organic acids, Amines and nitrogen compounds. EPDM is rated better with Esters and ethers, Halogenated hydrocarbons, Foods and beverages. They perform similarly with Alkalis, Salts and salt solutions, Oxidising agents and halogens, Ketones and aldehydes.
About this data
The ratings come from the chemical resistance list published by Bürkle GmbH, which compiled them from raw-material manufacturers’ data. They describe laboratory tests on the raw material at 20 °C and 50 °C.
A finished part also sees pressure, mechanical stress, welds and mixtures that a laboratory test does not. Treat the rating as a first filter and test under your own conditions before relying on it.