Summary
- PP is rated better with
- Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils (+46 points); Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons (+33 points); Ketones and aldehydes (+32 points); Amines and nitrogen compounds (+29 points); Esters and ethers (+27 points); Organic acids (+12 points)
- Within 10 points of each other
- Mineral acids; Alkalis; Salts and salt solutions; Oxidising agents and halogens; Alcohols and glycols; Aromatic hydrocarbons; Halogenated hydrocarbons; Foods and beverages
Points are the difference in the share of rows rated A or B.
The two materials
PP
Polypropylene
Polypropylene resists most acids, alkalis and salt solutions. Concentrated oxidising acids, chlorinated solvents and aromatic hydrocarbons attack it, and it turns brittle below about 0 °C.
Rated rows: 978. A 66 %, B 11 %, C 15 %, D 8 %
PMP
Polymethylpentene (TPX)
Polymethylpentene (TPX) is a transparent polyolefin used for labware. It resists many acids and alkalis, while aromatic and chlorinated solvents and strong oxidisers attack it.
Rated rows: 416. A 55 %, B 6 %, C 7 %, D 32 %
Share of rows rated A or B, by chemical class
How often the two ratings agree
Chemical classes were assigned by this site, not by the source. Mixtures and trade products without a clear class are not counted.
By chemical class
| Chemical class | PP: rated A or B | PMP: rated A or B |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral acids | 70 % (63 rows) | 71 % (35 rows) |
| Organic acids | 97 % (64 rows) | 85 % (26 rows) |
| Alkalis | 100 % (22 rows) | 100 % (17 rows) |
| Salts and salt solutions | 99 % (198 rows) | 100 % (67 rows) |
| Oxidising agents and halogens | 72 % (61 rows) | 67 % (30 rows) |
| Alcohols and glycols | 93 % (59 rows) | 96 % (28 rows) |
| Phenols | 79 % (14 rows) | – |
| Ketones and aldehydes | 69 % (35 rows) | 37 % (27 rows) |
| Esters and ethers | 63 % (71 rows) | 36 % (42 rows) |
| Amines and nitrogen compounds | 79 % (39 rows) | 50 % (10 rows) |
| Aromatic hydrocarbons | 14 % (14 rows) | 10 % (10 rows) |
| Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons | 63 % (78 rows) | 30 % (37 rows) |
| Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils | 75 % (48 rows) | 29 % (14 rows) |
| Halogenated hydrocarbons | 4 % (70 rows) | 3 % (33 rows) |
| Foods and beverages | 100 % (46 rows) | 100 % (13 rows) |
Where the ratings differ most
Rows where the two ratings at 20 °C are at least two grades apart: 48 in total, the first 40 shown.
| Chemical | Concentration | PP | PMP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic Anhydride | technical grade | A | D |
| Acetophenone | A | D | |
| Allyl Acetate | 100 % | A | D |
| Crotonaldehyde | technical grade | A | D |
| Diisobutyl Ketone | technical grade | A | D |
| Diisobutylene | A | D | |
| Diisooctyl Phthalate (DOP) | technical grade | D | A |
| Ethyl Acetate | 100 % | A | D |
| Ethyl Chloroacetate | technical grade | A | D |
| Hydrobromic Acid | 40 % | A | D |
| Hydrobromic Acid | 50 % | A | D |
| Hydrobromic Acid | dilute | A | D |
| Hydrocyanic Acid (Hydrogen Cyanide) | aqueous | A | D |
| Isooctane | technical grade | A | D |
| Methyl Acetate | technical grade | A | D |
| Methyl Chloroacetate | technical grade | A | D |
| Methyl Dichloroacetate | A | D | |
| Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) | A | D | |
| Nail Polish Remover | A | D | |
| Nitrotoluene | technical grade | A | D |
| Pine Needle Oil | A | D | |
| Vinyl Acetate | technical grade | A | D |
| White Spirit | A | D | |
| 1-Pentanethiol | B | D | |
| Acetic Acid | 10 % | A | C |
| Acetic Acid | 100 % | A | C |
| Allyl Mustard Oil | B | D | |
| Butylphenol | 100 % | A | C |
| Butyraldehyde | B | D | |
| Chlorine | 10 % wet | D | B |
| Chloroacetone | B | D | |
| Cresol | B | D | |
| Epichlorohydrin | 100 % | B | D |
| Ethyl Formate | B | D | |
| Fats, Cooking Oils | C | A | |
| Methyl Acrylate | B | D | |
| Methyl Formate | B | D | |
| Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) | 100 % | B | D |
| Methyl Oleate | B | D | |
| Nitric Acid | 66 % | D | B |
Rating scale
- A very good resistance
- B good resistance
- C limited resistance
- D not resistant
- – no data
- K no general statement possible
A rating marked * is an estimate in the source, not a test result. An estimate is given as one value without a temperature.
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PP or PMP more chemical-resistant?
Of 416 chemicals rated for both materials at 20 °C, PP and PMP share the same rating in 276 rows (66 %). PP is rated better in 111 rows and PMP in 29 rows.
How do PP and PMP compare for chemical resistance?
Based on 416 chemicals tested for both: PP is rated better with Vegetable and animal oils, fats, essential oils, Fuels, mineral oils and aliphatic hydrocarbons, Ketones and aldehydes, Amines and nitrogen compounds. PMP is rated better with –. They perform similarly with Mineral acids, Alkalis, Salts and salt solutions, Oxidising agents and halogens.
About this data
The ratings come from the chemical resistance list published by Bürkle GmbH, which compiled them from raw-material manufacturers’ data. They describe laboratory tests on the raw material at 20 °C and 50 °C.
A finished part also sees pressure, mechanical stress, welds and mixtures that a laboratory test does not. Treat the rating as a first filter and test under your own conditions before relying on it.